Here's a snippet from a blog I found today - Every Woman Has An Eating Disorder.
"As some of you know, Iâm a big proponent of the anti-diet movement. Weight Watchers, as flexible as the plan may be, still, in my mind, constitutes a diet. Before issuing my official stance on WW, however, I decided to attend a meeting.
A little bit of background: I was first introduced to WW through clients whoâve enrolled throughout the years. About five years ago, a client described her adherence to a WW food plan, as I listened intently:
âI get 24 points a day.â
âHow many points are in a slice of pizza?â I asked, thinking of the smaller size slices typical of Dominoâs, or Papa Johnâs, that I regularly enjoyed.
â8.â
âOh. . . So, what if you happen to have three slices of pizza for lunch?â
âThatâs it.â
âYou canât eat the rest of the day?â
âNot technically.â
I began to think about the programâs restrictions and its tendency to promote alternate episodes of bingeing and fasting. Personally, I like to conceptualize what I eat as food, not points, and I canât bear the possibility of restrictions. Iâm the kind of person who, when visiting some friends in Ventura, CA and learning that there were no public bathrooms (Iâm still perplexed!) immediately had to pee. Tell me not to eat, and youâd better clear the trajectory between the bag of Twizzlers and my mouth.
Nevertheless, I didnât pursue a research degree for nothing, so it was only fair to gather some background data before I published my conclusions. This is how I ended up at a Manhattan WW meeting last week.
Just before noon, I entered the building and climbed the steps to the second floor, which opened to the meeting itself. The first thing I saw? The scales. (Cue the score to Jaws.) As those of you who know me are aware, I donât believe in scales.
I completed a registration form and took my place on line. The card asked for my address. In anticipation of the upcoming, frequent mailings, I wondered, âWhat will the mailman think?â For the record, Iâve never before pondered the intricacies of my mail carrierâs mind. The form also inquired about any âdisabilityâ I might have that would require special consideration. I thought about the scales that lined the reception area. Yes, in fact, I have a condition that requires people to treat me with dignity and respect. Itâs quite disabling. I also had to sign a waiver of damages, indicating that I would not hold WW responsible for any adverse health consequences. What, exactly, were they planning to do to me?
At the front of the line, I greeted the lady behind the counter, handed her my card, and stated that I was here to try out a meeting.
â$13, please.â
âOh, I thought the first meeting was free.â
âNo, itâs $13.â
âBut, on the web site, it said the first meeting was free.â
âIâm not sure where you saw that.â
Probably on the specific web page entitled, âVisit a Weight Watchers Meeting for Free!â (See for yourself: http://www.weightwatchers.com/beourguest/index.aspx)
I scrounged through my bag for $13 and handed it to her, intent on not causing a scene, in a place where Iâm already. . . out-of-place.
âHow tall are you,â she asked.
â5â6.â
âOk, now, put down your bag, take off your shoes, and step on the scale.â
âOh, I really donât want to be weighed.â (part defiance, part personal philosophy)
âYou have to be weighed. You donât have to look, and I wonât tell you, but you have to be weighed in order to register.â
âOh, you see, I donât want to register. I just want to try out a meeting.â
She threw my $13 on the counter and said, âSee me at the end if youâre interested in joining.â
Not off to such a good start.
I take a seat and survey the room. I notice a man from my gym. Terrific. What catches my attention is the preponderance of already-thin women. I wonder if theyâre WW success stories, or if theyâre just starting out, New York Cityâs take on âoverweight.â Diaries, food planners, and boxes of Pretzel Thins, Smoothies, and Mini-Bars line the shelves that occupy the roomâs perimeter. An older woman seated in front of me has a banana and a Diet Coke. (Lunch?) I later learn sheâs been on the program for 40 years. 40 years?! I debate whether Iâd rather go to WW or wander the desert for 40 years.
The meeting is facilitated by a woman Iâll call âMarilyn.â Sheâs 60-ish, and I believe sheâs had work done on her face. Marilyn begins the discussion by focusing on âlapses,â when WW members fall off the wagon and eat in excess of their points. She mentions the tendency to overeat once youâve already lapsed, rationalizing, âIâll never be thin, anyway.â Her analysis is consistent with a cognitive therapy approach and focuses on the thought distortion known as âblack-and-whiteâ thinking. Nice work, Marilyn.
Marilyn continues by querying why a lapse occurs. People volunteer: stress, illness, missing meetings, attending dinner parties/special events. As solutions, members reiterate their commitment to plan their meals, come to meetings, and use their extra points. Marilyn also asks the group about their âlast-straw incident,â the final push that brought them to WW (e.g., seeing themselves in a photo, doctorâs advice). She transitions to other ways people might handle their emotions, rather than reaching for food. Members offer: exercise, reading, talking to a friend. Here, Marilyn focuses on enhancing coping resources and self-soothing techniques. Not bad. Later on, she returns to the experience of emotions and, capturing the omnipresent legitimacy of what you feel, states, âYou canât take a feeling away from somebody.â Thatâs right.
Throughout the meeting, various members share their stories. Following one, Marilyn praises, âThatâs a little bravo!â She hands out stickers as positive reinforcement. I suppose candy is out of the question. I donât know what the stickers said. I didnât get one.
It seems that in order to qualify for whatâs called âlifetime membership,â youâre supposed to weigh below a certain amount. Marilyn points out that if thereâs a bona fide reason youâre unable to attain this goal, âYou can get a doctorâs note and Weight Watchers will accept that.â At one point, Marilyn notes, âHaving a plan like this makes you feel happy.â I can understand secure, hopeful, in control, but Iâm not sure I get âhappy.â
Inadvertently, I learn a little bit about the food plan. It seems that, daily, youâre allowed two milks, two teaspoons of oil, five fruits, unlimited vegetables (mostly), a limited amount of grains and proteins at every meal, and â3-4 points a day for goodies.â I learn how to use âpointingâ as a verb and that it has nothing to do with my index finger.
One woman reveals that following a meeting last week, she left and âimmediately went outâ and âwas bad.â To me, thereâs no such thing as âbad,â unless youâre hurting someone else, and itâs frustrating how commonly moralityâs intertwined with food. I can, however, understand the need to rebel, particularly following a weigh-in (with consequent shame) and a discussion on restriction.
Marilyn closes the meeting by offering, âThink where you donât want to be again and where you want to go.â
My answers arrive without pause (âhereâ and âhomeâ), though, surprisingly, Iâm not opposed to the program in its entirety. It seems to offer a bare bones approach to healthy eating, provides social support, incorporates a number of sound psychological principles, and is less restrictive than most diets I know. Still, it is a diet, forces (I believe) a fixation on counting and planning, and in its (even flexible) restrictions, canât help but arouse rebellionâIâm not surprised when I hear how various members have yo-yoed as a result. Oh, and the scales? They really gotta go. . ."
When I was just a few weeks pregnant with my last daughter, I went to a Weight Watchers meeting. I had been on the program for a while, and had my most successful week to date (six pounds). When I mentioned that I was then, pregnant, I was kicked out. I lost all motivation at that point. The leader said I could no longer attend - or weigh in - because they couldn't promote weight loss during pregnancy. All I wanted to do was maintain. I'll never go back - even if I truly "need" a program like that.